Samsung Galaxy s5

[NSX]

pa gledam subjektivno naravno, ne sviđa mi se kako "šljašti" ne znam kako da ti objasnim međutim to im je najisplativije da proizvode i to prolazi

a inače znaš i sam da imam malo drugačije kriterijume od mainstreama kad su mobilni u pitanju

[Bugi]

On samo traži display sa što vjernijim bojama.
Međutim ja kao user to tražim na Display od laptopa ili na TV a na mobilni želim da "šljašti"


Edit: NSX, neko će reći da imamo duple nickove. Čak smo istu riječ stavili pod navodnicima.

Poslato sa ultra-moderne pisaće mašine Galaxy S4 x2

[Emix]

Ja znam sve to ali ekran "sljasti" zato sto je ogroman, 5". Sljastio je i onaj na S2 ali je Amoled toliko unapredjen od tad da je ova prica skroz glupa.
Ljudi zele takve ekrane na telefonima a oni koji ne zele imaju izbor zato i ima nekoliko mode-a za prikaz pa svako izabere. Nije tacno da su boje nerealne i da sljaste kad se stavi Professional Photo Mode ili Movie Mode.

The Galaxy S5′s display was found to have the most accurate colors for any smartphone or tablet when Cinema Mode is activated, and it was also the brightest display ever tested by DisplayMate, having the ability to reach 698 nits of brightness when automatic brightness was enabled.

[NSX]

šta ja znam meni smeta i na mobilnom, pogotovo nakon par dana gledanja u XZU..

P.S. a to da je brightest to je sigurno ali to mi i ne treba toliko

[montenegrina]

Ja sam bas danas primijetila ovo o cemu NSX pise. Malo sam koristila Samsung, mozda zato. Konkretno ikonica Evernote koja je zelena, izgleda tako neprirodno i drecavo na Note 2. Kod mene ba Onecje nekako boja prirodna. Ista ikonica a skroz drugacija. Ista je stvar sa Samsung monitorima. Napucane boje.
Imacicu rukama za koji dan S5 pa cu vidjeti kako je ovo na njemu

Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk 4

[MontSAT]

A cuo sam da na nekom displeju jabuka, kruska, lubenica, prsuta ne izgledaju prirodno, al da ikonica izgleda neprirodno e to nisam...
Kako vama nije dobro

Sent from my Z1

[bosko10]

A cuo sam da na nekom displeju jabuka, kruska, lubenica, prsuta ne izgledaju prirodno, al da ikonica izgleda neprirodno e to nisam...
Kako vama nije dobro

Sent from my Z1

Hahahahahhaha

A da mozda ta ikona na one ne izgleda neprirodno, blijedo, isprano, staro…?

Sent from my LG-D802 using Tapatalk

[mneonly]

Displej testovi i ocjene: http://www.phonearena.com/reviews/Sc...5-vs-G2_id3652

[montenegrina]

A cuo sam da na nekom displeju jabuka, kruska, lubenica, prsuta ne izgledaju prirodno, al da ikonica izgleda neprirodno e to nisam...
Kako vama nije dobro

Sent from my Z1

Ja bi se zabrinula da se ti nijesi oglasio
Valjda znas sto je zelena boja ili ne? Evernote koristim na vise racunara, na telefonu i eto juce sam na primjeru te ikonice vidjela te Samsungove napucane boje. Drecavo zelena, ali ti ne bi bio ti kad ne bi imao da dodas nesto nebitno. Bilo je kratko vrijeme u kojem sam cackala Note, tako da nije bilo prilike da vidim sliku prsuta i ne sumnjam da bi i ta boja bila prejaka i mozda oku mnogo vise privlacna od ove drecavo zelene. Nijesam ulazila u dublje detaljisanje, cisto se osvrnuh na raspravu koja se prethodno vodila oko Samsung boja.
Evo o tome imas i u textu koji je postavio Mneonly, pa procitaj, nije na odmet Na S5 izgleda su pokusali da to isprave ali opet su boje dosta jake, iako ima vise modova. Ali tek za koji dan cu moci reci kako to izgleda, da ne pricam napamet.

"Inaccurate color reproduction has long been an issue for AMOLED screens. Here's the thing: AMOLED screens, especially those used by Samsung, produce extra-saturated, contrasty, and punchy colors that happen to be very alluring for consumers. However, what's often missed is that those colors are also quite off. For example, green and blue are usually too strong, while secondary colors, like yellow, often appear greenish. That is not the case with IPS LCD screens. So, why should we care if Samsung's screens are inaccurate, when they actually look so eye-catchy? Well, this type of issue certainly isn't going to annoy some users that much, but in our opinion, it's relatively important, because it has a substantial impact on the look of all content on your phone. For example, if you're watching a video, people usually do not appear with a natural tone to their skin, but rather, they start looking like carrots - with an orange look, due to the overly-boosted color tones. Besides, everything has a bluish/greenish tint on it, because of the disbalance of colors. Another reason why you want the colors of your screens to be as close as those specified in the sRGB colorspace (that's what we mean by saying 'an accurate screen'), is that most content out there is created with this colorspace in mind, meaning that if you want content to look as intended, you need to have a screen that's as close as possible to the reference sRGB values."


Ne shvatam ljude poput tebe koji na forumu obicno pisu, eto, da bi nesto napisali.

Bosko10, One je star vec godinu dana i odradjeno je dovoljno testova, ako si citao, i pokazano je da One ima vjerodostojne boje, nikako isprane ili slicno.

[BiTrAtE]

:mrgreen:

Sent from my iPhone 5S using Tapatalk

[bosko10]

Hahaha dobro radi otisak prsta na ovaj iphone flex nema sto… ))))

Sent from my LG-D802 using Tapatalk

[Emix]

Tako to izgleda kad iPhone freak "testira" nesto... nista novo.

[Emix]

http://www.sammobile.com/2014/04/15/...-three-months/

[Lucas]

:mrgreen:

Sent from my iPhone 5S using Tapatalk

Al pazi ti kako je to providno, na iPhone nalegao prst pravilno, a na S5 kao da pokušava da ga ogrebe nešto mlati prstom gore dolje, više izgleda da češe prst nego da pokušava da otključa.

[An0n1mUs]

Al pazi ti kako je to providno, na iPhone nalegao prst pravilno, a na S5 kao da pokušava da ga ogrebe nešto mlati prstom gore dolje, više izgleda da češe prst nego da pokušava da otključa.

Ti ocigledno ne znas kako radi fingerprint na S5.

[Lucas]

Ti ocigledno ne znas kako radi fingerprint na S5.

Lično probao. Ali opet ne može se ivicom prsta prelaziti preko fp. Imam osjećaj da češe ivicu prsta o fingerprint. Neće valjda da očita zanokticu nego otisak?

[Kradem_Shahte]

Samsung Galaxy S5 fingerprint scanner hacked



http://www.phonearena.com/news/Samsung-Galaxy-S5-fingerprint-scanner-hacked-PayPal-reaffirms-confidence-in-biometrics_id55193

[BiTrAtE]

Al pazi ti kako je to providno, na iPhone nalegao prst pravilno, a na S5 kao da pokušava da ga ogrebe nešto mlati prstom gore dolje, više izgleda da češe prst nego da pokušava da otključa.

Kako mislis nalegao prst pravilno? KAKO GOD da stavis prst na iphone ali bas kako god u 360 stepeni, radice fp normalno. Slazem se da je malo iskarikiran ovaj gif ali je cinjenica da na S5 moras da nacentriras pravu liniju od displeja do fp-a sto je em prvo slide to fp em drugo fp u bijednom pokusaju.

[An0n1mUs]

Lično probao. Ali opet ne može se ivicom prsta prelaziti preko fp. Imam osjećaj da češe ivicu prsta o fingerprint. Neće valjda da očita zanokticu nego otisak?

To je jedini nacin da jednom rukom koristis fp, ili da palac snimis iz 5 uglova.

[NSX]

Ja znam sve to ali ekran "sljasti" zato sto je ogroman, 5". Sljastio je i onaj na S2 ali je Amoled toliko unapredjen od tad da je ova prica skroz glupa.Ljudi zele takve ekrane na telefonima a oni koji ne zele imaju izbor zato i ima nekoliko mode-a za prikaz pa svako izabere. Nije tacno da su boje nerealne i da sljaste kad se stavi Professional Photo Mode ili Movie Mode.The Galaxy S5′s display was found to have the most accurate colors for any smartphone or tablet when Cinema Mode is activated, and it was also the brightest display ever tested by DisplayMate, having the ability to reach 698 nits of brightness when automatic brightness was enabled.

ne znam jesi li vidio post na benchu uglavnom..So, here's the skinny on the #GalaxyS5 cinema mode... I don't like ever being told that it is "accurate". It's not accurate. It creates a less saturated effect ( and people appreciate that) but it's not accurate. For one with sRGB we are looking for a response that at least conforms to an average gamma around 2.2. The Cinema mode is 2.42, just the same as the standard mode. Higher gamma can make for more saturated images and can add more contrast to an image so it doesn't look so "light". For some people this looks nice so I won't knock it. But in no way does gamma 2.42 = 2.2 for the standard we are looking for. In the CIE diagram I can see that indeed, with cinema mode, the gamut (range of color displayed) becomes smaller, especially around red and green. That's all well and good. What I don't like is that Samsung is still messing around with the saturations. They are tweaking blue, green, and magenta. This kinda makes hues look off (like the color becomes a different color as saturation increases) and the saturation dots look "compressed" in places meaning that they are still boosting saturation. What a load of bull. I have watched some content in Cinema mode and it tends to look alright on average, so you can certainly use it if you are not wanting reds and greens to look overblown. But in the UI it just looks plain awful. I feel like I am jabbing my eyeball with a fork because the colors are not true to life. Possibly they look "less saturated", but to "real life" come on, anyone can admit they look like nonsense.ondafor a few years now Display Mate reports the same about cinéma mode, previously called Movie mode. Erica and I were speculating yesterday on how this started, as we're both surprised the same anyone could consider this color tuning mode calibrated to anything. Since Samsung introduced it, people were asking me about it and based on measurements and looking at it my answer has been that it's a color grading, an "effect" that gives some intentional character to the image. At the expense of making most colors really off : some become another color instead, some are weirdly de-saturared. No problem as artistic effect. However claiming that this display tuning mode calibrates to accurate colors is the equivalent of taking a pic with the camera, applying some filter in Instagram and stating that now the image is calibrated. That doesn't make any sense. DisplayMate measurements seem to be made by measuring color patterns by hand His business is selling at a $79 starting point images to display on your monitor / TV on an USB key https://wwws.monmouth.com/displaymate/orders.html I assume he uses the same mythology in his tests. The big problem with this approach is that he's measuring only so few points, like for saturation he has 100% and 50%. That's very far from enough data to draw any conclusion on color accuracy so possibly why he managed to came up with conclusions making no sense at all. The funny thing is that some of the raw data published is actually correct. Like he calculates the average gamma for the S5 at 2.4. That's about right. But the thing is 2.4 instead of about 2.2 to simplify is no good (too dark, also increasing color saturation). Years ago I tried contributing reporting him errors in the methodology, wrong assumptions and problems with conclusions in his articles. At that time his reaction was to block me on Twitter. And no improvement has been made unfortunately. There's really few resources talking about displays and color science in mobile, unless explained with talent is not the easiest to approach. The Web deserves better than the quality of publications today.tako da nista od toga

[AmFi]

Cackah sad tel u telenor. I sta se desava. Pogasim sve app iz taska i malo cackam i opet pogasim i ulazim u app da izmjerim puls itd itd. Pritiskam start za keniranje izlazi unfortunately bla bla. Ja gledam i ne vjerujem opet ulazim i pritiskam start tel zabagova i nista se ne desava samp u jednom momentu force close haahhaha e pa jada

Sent from my TELEFON using TETRAPAK 4

[MontSAT]

I sad treba svi da zaključimo da je to kanta koja baguje i koči, i ne treba ni da pomišljamo na kupovinu?

Sent from my ZTE Blade Q using Tapatalk

[NSX]

ma radi OK čini mi se TW je dosta brži nego na S4, e sad svaki tel. ima poneki bug pogotovo u prvim verzijama

[AmFi]

Ne treba da se zakljucuje. Ja sam samo rekao da je tel od 600+ eura zabagovao. Pokakim se u sred njega. Neka HTC ONE ILI M8 zabaguju. Pa vazi

Sent from my TELEFON using TETRAPAK 4

[Lucas]

Ne treba da se zakljucuje. Ja sam samo rekao da je tel od 600+ eura zabagovao. Pokakim se u sred njega. Neka HTC ONE ILI M8 zabaguju. Pa vazi

Sent from my TELEFON using TETRAPAK 4

Baguje android, ne baguje proizvođač, shvataš da je u svim tim telefonima android? Da je do aplikacije, bagovala bi na svakom telefonu, Force Close se dešava na apsolutno svakom telefonu, samo zavisi do verzije androida, kod novijih je to daleko manje izraženo.

Nemoj gajiti iluzije da je bilo koji telefon zaštićen od toga, ako npr u verziji 4.4.2 ima problem sa imenikom, svi telefoni na 4.4.2 će imati problem sa imenikom, bez obzira je li HTC, Sony, Samsung itd.

Kao što vidiš i M8 baguje poprilično, malo proguglaš prije nego se kakiš u neki telefon:

http://forums.androidcentral.com/htc...s-defects.html
http://forums.androidcentral.com/goo...m8-issues.html
http://forums.androidcentral.com/htc...ation-bug.html