Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 67

Thread: Duklja (Doclea), the first Montenegrin state under the first dynasty

  1. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    La Fossa
    Posts
    6,668
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Default

    Blondie does it better on back side :mrgreen:
    Io ci credo!

    Welcome



  2. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    54
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Talking

    None,they both get fucked when they're on their back
    Do citanja,

    Sparclight

  3. #28
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    533
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sparclight
    None,they both get fucked when they're on their back
    there are some blondes here as well...so keep the discussion about blondes decent

  4. #29
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    570
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Default Doclea - one of the oldest Slavic states in the South

    Duklja or Diokletija (Modern Serbian variations: Дукља or Диоклетија; Latin: Doclea or Diocleia; Greek: Διοκλεισ) was a Slavic medieval state with hereditary lands roughly encompassing the territories of the Zeta River, Skadar Lake and the Boka bay and bordering with Travunia at Kotor. Duklja was at first a semi-independent part of the Grand Principality (Zhupanate) of Rascia (Raška) which was a vassal of the Eastern Roman Empire and later directly under Byzantine suzerainty until it won its independence in the mid-11th century, ruled by the House of Vojislav (Vojislavljević). After a large fall, Doclea was incorporated into the unified Serbian state, where it remained until the fall of the Serbian emperor, tsar Stefan Uroš IV Dušan, where it became the state of Zeta.

    //
    Name

    "Doclea", the name of the region during the early period of the Roman Empire, was termed for an early Illyrian tribe. The Roman Emperor Diocletian hailed from this region. In later centuries, Romans "hyper-corrected" the name to Dioclea, wrongly guessing that an "I" had been lost due to vulgar speech patterns. "Duklja" is the later Slavic version of that word. The actual city of Dioclea was located at present-day Podgorica (throughout the Middle Ages known as Ribnica).

  5. #30
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    570
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Default

    Geography

    Doclea (roughly Montenegro today) bordered the Byzantine Theme of Dyrrachion to the east, at the City of Bar and Travunia to the west. From the Skadar Lake at the east its territory sprang down the river of Zeta all the way to the river of Piva to the west. Afterwards, Skadar became the capital of the state until the end of the Middle Ages. The Royal Capital of Duklja was Ston. It had only three major settlements: Gradac (Old Budva, the ancient Serbian capital), Novi Grad and Lontodoclea. The most important City was Diocleia (after which the entire Archonty was named), but that city was in ruins by the 10th century from numerous invasions. Doclea was split on Zhupanates, each with its own City: Lusca, Podlugiae, Gorsca, Cuceva with Budva, Cupelnich, Obliquus, Prapratna (between Bar and Ulcinj), Cermenica and Gripuli. Continental Doclea, or Submontana (Podgoria), which was between the rivers of Rama and Morača, was consisted of: Onogost, Moratia, Comerniza, Piva, Gerico, Netusini, Guisemo, Com, Debreca, Neretva and Rama. Ever since the 12th century, the term Zeta, a smaller geographical part of Doclea, started to replace the name of this Archonty.

  6. #31
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    570
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Default

    History


    Early

    Byzantine Emperor Constantine VII Porphyrogenitos' De Administrando Imperio from the mid-10th century mentions Doclea in the story of the province of Dalmatia:
    Now, the said Croatia and the rest of the Slavonic regions are situated thus: Diocleia is neighbour to the forts of Dyrrachium, I mean, to Elissus and to Helcynium and Antibari, and comes up as far as Decatera, and on the side of the mountain country it is neighbour to Serbia. It was one of the four southern Dalmatian Slavic principalities (Sclavinias). Although Slavs populated the regions of Dioclitia since as early as the 5th-6th century, the greater waves of Slavic migrants (traditionally classified as Serbs) came in the 630s by the White Serbs under the Unknown Archont. The land was given by the Byzantine Emperor Flavius Heraclius Augustus to settle and accept his supreme rule. During the Slavic intrusions, the City of Diocleia was mostly ransacked. Many were baptised during Emperor Heraclius' missions on baptising the Serbs by missionaries from Rome.
    According to the legend, the Slavs came to the western Balkans under one ruling family. The legend continues the tale how the Slavic Realm was partitioned into two halves. One of the halves - Dalmatia - was further partitioned into two halves. The story tells of how Duklja was a part of Transmontana (yet another half) of one of those halves - Dioclea1.
    In 732, Eastern Roman Emperor Leo III the Isaurian took the region of Doclea from the suzerainity of the Bishop of Rome Gregory III and gifted it to the Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople, Anastasius, thus quelling the previously dominant Latin culture and restoring the dominance Hellenism. The Latin language and culture remained only in the old coastal Romanized cities. The Principality of Doclea was subjected to the Grand Principality of Rascia, under Grand Prince Vlastimir of All Rascias, but kept endorsing its semi-independence. The Slavic pagans of Doclea were fully baptised together with all Serbs under Grand Princes Stefan and Petar in the 9th century.
    Prince Ceslav of Klomir of the House of Vlastimir, last descendant of the Unknown Archont, created a Realm of Serbia and managed to excerpt control over more than 70% of Doclea's territory. The Byzantine enclaves of Kotor, Bar and Ulcinj had to pay taxes and sometimes were even governed by the Doclean rulers.

    Lead stamp of archont Petar (or Predimir) (9th century), the first known ruler of Duklja; The Holy Virgin Mary with the Christ Child (left) and inscription in Greek "+ Petar archont of Dioklia AMIN" (right).

  7. #32
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    570
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Default

    High Middle Ages, Voislav, Golden Age

    The anarchic ages that followed the dawn of the 11th century were crucial for Duklja. The people of Kotor rebelled and lynched the Doclean Prince Dragomir in 1018, and the Byzantine forces occupied Doclea to restore order. Dragomir's son Dobroslav goes into poverty. Dobroslav acted twosome: he was constantly praising Byzantine rule and at the same time rousing up the people against the Emperor.

    The Church of St. Mihailo in Ston from 1080, a foundation of King Mihailo Voislav.


    In 1034, Dobroslav, also called Stefan Voislav (Stefan Vojislav; the eponym of the House of Voislav), son of Dragomir, who was among the Serbian Travunian gentry, was elected to lead a movement to liberate the Serbs in the Adriatic coastlands. By the time of the rebellion, Voislav already had 5 sons with his wife, a cousin of Tsar Samuil. While Voislav was preparing for war, he played nice with the Byzantines, assuring them that he was their faithful subject. He gained the nickname "Stefan" from the Greek word Stephanos meaning "crowned" to resemble his independent power and proclaimed himself Achont of Serbs. In 1035 he led the Serbs into an uprising, but the Byzantines have quickly manage to impose peace terms. Voislav was taken hostage to Constantinople in the summer of 1036 and the uprising was quelled, and the task of occupying Duklja was given to Serbia's strategos Theophilos Erotikos. Voislav managed to escape imprisonment in 1037 and retake the land of the Serbs, where he withdrew to the mountains and maintained guerilla resistance with an ever-growing group of highlanders. There he started to attack and take over leadership among the neighbouring Serbs, Tribals the tribes in the "Illyrian mountains" that recognized Byzantine supreme rule throughout 1038. He succeeded in pushing the fight to expel strategos Theophilos from Serbia and briefly create an independent territory from the Skadar lake to the Hum mountain, seated at Scutari. He also helped the neighbouring uprising of Slavs that quickly expanded from Belgrade across Naissus to Skopje led by Petar Delian, as well as the Tihomir's Slavic uprising in Dyrrachion. Those involved in the uprising even reached the ruins of Thebes, Greece on one occasion, so the Byzantines left Duklja untroubled for some time.

    Mihailo Voislav, the first recognized ruler of Duklja on a fresco in the Church of St. Michael in Ston: He was crowned as King of Slavs and became known as the Ruler of Tribals and Serbs during his reign.

  8. #33
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    570
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Default

    The death of Prince Ceslav brought an opportunity for a more independent Doclea. In the middle of the 10th century, the Travunian Princes have fought long wars against Doclea's Ban. Eventually, Doclea was conquered and Travunia and Doclea were united under one ruling family. Folk tales call their rulers "Kings", when in fact, they were nothing more than mere Princes. "King" Predimir is the first known ruler - and he ruled his "Kingdom" from his capital at Onogošt. One tale is kept from his life: After the fall of the Bulgarian Czardom, Rascia was invaded by the Byzantines by Emperor John I Tzimiskes and his generals and Rassa was conquered. Rascia's Zhupan fled together with his sons Plenus and Radigrad and daughter Prechvala to exile to Onogost to Predimir. According to the tale, Predimir heavily fell in love with the beautiful Rascian princess Prechvala, and immediately convened a council to arrange a political offer to the Rascian ruling house. Predimir was to marry Prechvala - while Rascia's Zhupan and his sons would become vassals under "King" Predimir's protection. Rascia's Prince and his sons agreed and swore an oath of loyalty to Predimir and his subjects. The newfound "King"'s relatives were given the territory of Tribessa as a marriage gift and established Radigrad as the honorary Zhupan of Onogost, while the new marriage was celebrated in a regal fashion. Predimir and his father-in-law instigated a rebellion in Rassa - ordering the inhabitants to kill their Byzantine overlords. After the Greeks in Rassa were executed, Predimir came with his family to Rassa and annexed it, restoring his son-in-law as the Grand Prince of Rascia, while his cousins received various Princely titles.
    Predimir's sons from the marriage with Prechvala split his land after his death: the oldest son, Chlavimir ruled Zeta and the Zhupanates of: Lusca, Podlugiae, Gorsca, Cupelnich, Obliquus, Prapratna, Cermenica and Budva with Cuceva and Gripuli. Second son, Boleslav, got the Zhupanates of: Libomir, Vetanica, Rudina, Crusceviza, Vrmo, Rissena, Draceviza, Canali, Gernoviza. Dragoslav ruled in Zachlumia and got the following Zhupanates: Stantania, Papava, Yabsko, Luca, Vellica, Gorimita, Vecenike, Dubrava and Debre. The youngest son, Svevlad, ruled Submontana (Podgoria) and got the following Zhupanates: Onogost, Moratia, Comerniza, Piva, Gerico, Netusini, Guisemo, Com, Debreca, Neretva and Rama. The system of the Tetrarchy was adopted in the realm.

  9. #34
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    570
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Default

    The tale continues telling about Predimir's brother, King Krešimir of Croatia discarding his crippled son Leghec and sending him away to Travunia, where his cousin Boleslav regionally ruled. Story tells how Leghec married a local servant, Lovizza, with whom he had seven sons. Predimir's four sons ruled the people ruthlessly without any mercy, so Leghec and his sons raised a rebellion and lead the people to a civil war, until every single one of Predimir's sons and grandsons were killed - from the youngest to the oldest - save Boleslav's son Sylvester, who managed to flee to Ragusa. According to the story, Leghec ruled together with his seven sons as a vassal of the Croatian King Kresimir from Traiectus in the Bay of Kotor, where he built himself a fortress and a court. The story goes on telling how God got angry on Leghec's ruling family because of this betrayal, so he crippled Leghec even more, both physically and mentally - while infecting his sons with a pestilent disease. Very soon, the entire Leghec's family branch was extinct.
    The people returned Sylvester from Ragusa and enthroned him, restoring Predimir's dynasty. Sylvester ruled one-handedly the entire Tetrarchy with reverence and justice. He had a son, Tugemir, who succeeded him as Doclea's ruler, who was further succeeded by his own son, Chvalimir. Chvalimir divided the realm amongst his three sons: first-born Petrislav ruled Zeta, Dragomir ruled Travunia and Zachlumia, while the youngest, Miroslav, ruled over Transmontana (Podgoria). Miroslav died in the Lake of Skadar in a storm together with his entire crew, while travelling to visit his brothers on board a ship. Petrislav inherited his demesne - thus reunifying Duklja. After Petrislav died, he was buried in the Church of Prečista Krajina in the Frontier region. He was succeeded by his son, Vladimir.

  10. #35
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    570
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Default

    Saint Jovan Vladimir fought the Arbanass tribes that menaced the eastern territories. Skadar was subsequently formalised as the heart of Duklja. The Bulgarian Tsar Samuil invaded Doclea and took the Prince as a prisoner. As a result of a subsequent marriage between Jovan Vladimir and the Bulgarian princess Kossara, Jovan Vladimir was allowed to return and rule as a Bulgarian vassal. After the successful plot of the last Czar of the Bulgarian Empire Ivan Vladislav, Jovan Vladimir's life was taken on 22 May 1016. Saint Jovan Vladimir expanded his pretensions greatly by also becoming the ruler of Tribalia and Serbia. Vladimir's seat was at Katrkol, below the Church of Precista Krajina. His remains were shifted from monastery to monastery until they were finally placed in the Monastery of Saint John in Elbesan in Albania.
    Duklja became a part of the Byzantine theme of Serbia (thema Servia) under strategos of Serbia Constantine Diogenes; while its rulers remained only titulary. John Vladimir was succeeded by his nephew Dragomir who rules as a vassal of the Byzantine Empire. He married the daughter of Ljutomir, the successor to the Rascian throne.

  11. #36
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    570
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Default

    The Byzantine Emperor Michael, while waiting in Thessalonika, was to receive a shipment of gold of 10 Kentenars from Southern Italia. One Galley accidentally crashed in Duklja's Bay in the winter of 1039\40. Its treasures were taken by the Voislav's men, which greatly enriched Duklja's economy. This incurred Michael's fury, as he sent Imperial Eunuch George Probat to crush Voislav's movement. The Eunuch's Army was caught in an ambush in the Doclean gorges in 1040 in an ambush and suffered a total defeat. Voislav's son Radoslav was glorified especially for killing a Byzantine military commander himself on the battlefield; prevented by Bulgarian Czar Delian's advancements in the central Balkans, the Byzantines have made a pause in military offensives against Doclea.
    After quelling the Slavic uprising in Macedonia in 1041, the new Byzantine Emperor Constantine IX Monnomachos made a military attempt in 1042 with a grand army of 60,000 soldiers, led by the Commander of Dyrrachion, patricio Michael. The Emperor sent Michael with a lot of gold and silver to bribe the Rascians, Zachlumians and Bosnians against Doclea. The Army was advancing fast from Skadar to Bar. The Greeks raided the rich valleys of Lower Zeta, but they were attacked by the Serbs at the gorges at Sutorman. The Serbs, after initial successes, cornered the Greeks and slaughtered 40,000 soldiers and 7 strategoses (Byzantine military commanders). The were throwing at the cornered Greeks from high peaks everything they had - from arrows to rocks. They chased others to the river of Drim, until they were allowed to leave the battlefield, but completely naked. The leader of the native Byzantine-inspired coalition was Prince of Zachlumia and Travunia Ljutovid, that opposed Voislav's occupation of Travunia which he also claimed. After the Battle of Bar Voislav chose 50 captured Greeks and dispatched them to tell the tale, towards Zachlumia. Ljutovid was awaiting with his forces at Klobuk. He was attacked by Voislav's son Goislav and there were no major difficulties in defeating the demoralized Zachlumians. Gojislav and his two bodyguards killed Ljutovid in combat. After this, Voislav annexed most of Zachlumia (across Konavli up to Ston), became the undisputed ruler of the territory from Bojana to Neretva and even to Vojusa and expanded deeper inland, maintaining good relations with Bosnia and Rascia. The Slavic uprisings in Macedonia of Peter Delian who now crowned himself as Czar Peter II of Bulgarians stopped any possibility for another Byzantine military attempt against Duklja. Stephen Voislav's last actions were organizing a wedding of his son, whose Godfather was supposed to be the Byzantine strategos of Ragusa, Katakalon. However, Voislav found out that the strategos was preparing to ambush him, Voislav ambushed Katakalon with his entire escort and imprisoned them. The Serbs captured even the War Galleys and led Katakalon with them as a personal Voislav's slave to Ston.

  12. #37
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    570
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Default

    Around 1050 (as early as 1046 or as late as 1055) Voislav died, and was buried in the Church of Saint Andrews in his capital at Prapratna. He was succeeded by his son Mihailo. Mihailo immediately had to face a rebellion of the people in Travunia under Domanec and quelled it by force and installed his brother Saganek in 1052/4 as the new Prince of Trebinje. However, the legend tells how Dobroslav split his realm to all his five sons: Gojislav, Mihailo, Saganek, Radoslav and Predimir, with Gojislav as the eldest the head together with his mother and Voislav's wife, the relative of Czar Samuil, ruling together from Trebinje. In 1047-1050 the Travunian rebellion occurred, when the rebels murdered Gojislav and Mihailo managed to take over leadership and defeat them. After the death of his mother, Mihailo took the Rascian Grand Princely title and moved Doclea's capital to Kotor. One of Michael's first actions were prolonging the vassalage with the Byzantine Empire. Mihailo married into the Imperial family (since his first wife had just died), by taking the hand of a niece of Emperor Constantine IX in 1052. The Romeii entitled him protospator, an honorary commander of the Imperial Guard. Doclea coexisted with the Eastern Roman Empire for 20 years. Mihailo, exarch of Serbs, ruled with an iron hand the area from neretva to Bojana, but loyally to the Byzantine Emperor. At 1054, the Great Schism occurs and Doclea becomes the most eastern borderland of the suzeiranity of the Roman Catholic Church. At 1055 Domanec deposed Saganec from Trebinje and killed other Mihailo's brother, Predimir, in the fights; Mihailo's yet another brother, Radoslav, attacked Trebinje and killed Domanek. As a reward Mihailo placed him as a Prince in Zeta (Doclea proper). In 1060-1074 Prince Michael Voislav made attempts to conquer Rascia, and implaced around 1070 his son Petrislav as the Prince of Serbian Zagorje (a small part of Bosnia and Rascia). Mihailo Voislav sought alliance with the Papacy for recognition of independence and an autocephalous Church, seeking the Flag (vexilium) as a sign of recognition of a Kingdom. The Pope only responded by creating a Bishopric in Bar in 1067. When the Normans captured the Italian city of Bari from the Byzantines and Emperor Roman IV got captured by the Seljuk Turks in 1071, Mihailo broke off diplomatic relations with the Empire and in 1072 dispatched his son Bodin and a squadron of 300 finest Serb fighters under Duke Petrilo to Skopje, to meet the rebel Slavic boyars under George Voiteh and in an effort to conquer Bulgaria from the Byzantines. At Prizren, (since the House of Vojislavic succeeded the extinct Bulgarian dynasty), Bodin was crowned Peter III, Czar of Bulgarians. The new Czar's military forces quickly took Skopje and Ochryd. Bodin's forces were soon split, as he advanced far from his Macedonian homeland in an offensive towards Naissus. King Mihailo Voislav used this moment and together with the Croats attacked the Dalmatian coastal cities and advanced through the Theme of Dyrrachion. Bodin lost Skopje, so he was retreating towards Doclea, but was assaulted and defeated the same year at Pantino on Kosovo and took to the monastery of Saint Serge and Bacchus in Constantinople as a prisoner, but Byzantine governor Comnenus took him to Antioch in Syria later on. After the Macedonian rebellion was quelled, a new strategos was implaced in Dyrrachion - Nicephorus Briennes whose sole mission was to punish the Docleans and Croats. Nicephorus triumphed, even succeeded in taking a large number of hostages and Mihailo had to flee into hiding. The Byzantines slowly advanced, clearing the roads for their forces and kept large garrisons in the coastal Dalmatian cities. Mihailo had all of his sons from the first marriage executed during these grave times. All warring finally stopped in 1074, when Mihailo was able to retrieve most that the Byzantines conquered after the return of Nicephorus to Dyrrachion.

  13. #38
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    570
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Default

    In 1077 Mihailo Voislav captured Dubrovnik. The same year he was crowned King of Slavs by emissaries of Pope Gregory VII, accepting the supreme rule of the Papacy. Mihailo soon raised the little Church of Saint Michael in Ston - as a component part of his Royal seat, where he depicted himself with a Papal crown on a fresco. His realm was known as the Kingdom of Serbia, and Mihailo wore the title Ruler of Tribals and Serbs. Ever since Duklja's expansion into Croatia in which the Doclean forces raided as far as Knin, the full ruling title was King of Doclea and Dalmatia. King Mihailo Voislav always had desires for an autocephalous Church. The highest faction in his Kingdom was the Bishopric of Ragusa - which was subjected in turn to the Archbishopric of Split, which was outside of his realm. Mihailo went into a rescue mission with the help of several bribed Venetian traders in 1078 and liberated his son. Mihailo Voislav started to negotiate with the Normans in South Italia - sworn enemies of the Byzantines, and managed to marry his son Constantine Bodin to a Norman Princess - Janquinta Argyritzes in October of 1080.

    The map of the Kingdom of Duklja under King Constantin Bodin.


    This period was useful for Duklja. While its eastern borders were used as a demarcational zone between the Pope and the Ecumenical Patriarch, the rulers of Duklja used the Latin side to gain independence from the Byzantine, but enforced Eastern-rite and schismatic Orthodoxy so as not to be controlled by the Catholic west. Throughout the 11th century Doclea's population were classified as being Serbs.

  14. #39
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    570
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Default

    Constantin Bodin inherited his father's Doclean-Dalmatian kingdom in 1081 at the age of 25. He was a son-in-law of the Guy of Normandy Robert Guiscard. Bodin ruled unitarily with an iron hand, abolishing the old patriarchal tradition of each single ZHupan ruling his own demesne or joint reigns of an entire family. He came with an army in Byzantine aid to Dyrrachion which was being attacked by the Normans, and his squadrons, allied by the Albanians, menaced the Norman landings. Bodin's assistance was asked by both warring parties, but the Venetians' alliance with the Byzantines made him make up his mind. Although, King Bodin remained neutral in the finally battle on 18 October 1081, seeing the imminent victory of the Normans. Doclea was free of revenge, as the Normans invaded Epirus, Thessaly and Macedonia. King Bodin aided the Normans in their warring, although not directly. Around this time he invaded and annexed neighbouring Rascia and Bosnia; implacing courtirs Prince Stefan as the rule of Bosnia and his nephews Marko and Vukan as Zhupans of Rascia. The Normans retreated in 1085, which renewed hostilities against the Byzantines. Around this time King Bodin managed to take Dyrracion, but managed to hold it only for a short time. Constantine Bodin was a great supporter of Pope Urban II's fights against the self-proclaimed anti-Pope Clement III in 1089, so the Pope rewarding him by giving the finally long-awaited ecclesiastical autonomy to the Serbian people by elevating the Bishopric of Bar on 8 January 1089 to an Archbishopric, which included Serbia (Rascia+Doclea), Bosnia and Travunia (Bodin's uncle Radoslav, prince of Zachlumia, had died by 1089 and Zachlumia lost). Bar, Kotor and Ulcinj were taken away from the jurisdiction of the Archbishopric of Ragusa - as a compensation since the Kingdom of Doclea had just lost Ragusa to the Normans. Svac, Skadar, Drivast and Pilot were gripped from the Archbishopric of Dyrrachion - which caused the City's strategos John Ducas (Emperor Alexios' son-in-law) to attack Bodin and imprison him for the second time.

  15. #40
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    570
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Default

    Radoslav's (Bodin's uncle) son Branislav, the new Prince of Zeta, took over leadership of a rebellion in Doclea in Bodin's absence. It took some time until he was appeased and accepted the authority of Bodin, after his return. In Bodin's absence, Queen Jaquinta had Branislav imprisoned for life and took his descendants, the Branislavljevic branch of the royal family, under her tutelage. In Bodin's absence, Bosnia, Rascia and Zachlumia all seceded from Doclean control. Emperor Alexios kept Bodin caged longer even beyond 1091, as he was afraid of his connections with the Cumans, his sworn enemies that were just jeopardizing his Empire. When Constantine Bodin returned to the throne, immediately he went into a war with his cousin Prince Vukan of Rascia against the Byzantines. The tactics of scorched earth were utilized in this war. In the winter of 1096/7 an Army of Crusaders passed through Duklja under Count Raymond IV of Toulouse during the Crusade of 1101. King Bodin guested Raymond in his court in Skadar, where they befriended each other and even enbrothered themselves (this is the first occasion of enbrotherment among the South Slavs). Even in regards to this special friendship, conflicts between the Crusaders and the population were frequent up their arrival to Dyrrachion. Queen Jaquinta convinced King Bodin that his brothers-by-uncle Branislav and Gradislav are traitors. Bodin had Branislav executed and when he found out that Gradislav escaped to Dubrovnik, he attacked it, conquered it and beheaded Gradislav and his son Berinja. Bodin constructed a tower in Ragusa to bolster its defences. King Constantine Bodin, Archont of Serbs, died in 1101; he was buried in the Church of Saint Serge and Bacchus near Skadar. The people didn't want Jaquinta's children (Mihailo, Djordje, Arcisius Tomas, Markus), so he was succeeded by his legendary half-brother from Mihailo Voislav's first marriage, Dobroslav II, and the elected heir Mihailo deposed.
    Dobroslav III's reign was filled with dynastic intrigues in the court of Scutari. His cousin Kočapar of Branislav's branch goes to Rascia, where he is organizing the opposition. King Dobroslav II recognized Byzantine suzeiranity in fear of Kocopar's wrath. Grand Prince Vukan of Rascia eventually invaded Doclea and during the Battle of the Morača river captured him and took him into slavery to Rascia in 1102. Kočapar became the new King as a vassal of Rascia. King Kočapar didn't like Rascian supremacy and Rascia was starting to take over leadership over the Serbian lands - and this Kočapar couldn't handle. He married the daughter of the Bosnian Ban and made an anti-Rascian alliance in an attempt to retake the leadership. Vukan expelled him from Doclea as a punishment and implaced his cousin Vladimir in his place in 1103. Kočapar invaded Zachlumia, where he died fighting in futile. Vladimir became a son-in-law of the Rascian Grand Prince Vukan and ruled in a friendship with Rascia for almost 12 years. As a result, Vukan releases old King Dobroslav II and lets him peacefully return to Doclea. Queen Jaquinta assassinates King Vladimir and old King Dobroslav II in 1114 and implaced her son George. His cousin Grubeša assembled a Byzantine Army in Dyrrachion and ruled Doclea as a Prince since 1118, exiling him to Rascia and ruling in Byzantine name. Old Queen Jaquinta is captured by the Byzantines in Kotor and taken into life imprisonment to Constantinople. In 1125 old King George led the Rascian forces and defeated Grubesa at the battle of Bar, returning to the Doclean throne, although he had to split large portions of Doclean territory amongst his cousins. In 1126 and 1127 King George intervenes in Rascia and returns his friend, Zhupan Urosh, to power. To consolidate his power, George arrested and blinded to of his cousins that were pretenders to the throne, which united the 6 remaining pretenders to convince a Byzantine intervention from Dyrrachion in 1131, when he was taken to life imprisonment to Constantinople and implaced King Gradihna as a Byzantine vassal. George continued a guerrilla resistance until he died wandering across Dyrrachion to Constantinople later that same year. Gradihna died in 1146 and was succeeded by his son, Prince Radoslav. Doclea's regal title was finally lost together with its prestige and it downgraded back to a Principality. Grand Prince Uros II of Rascia invaded Doclea and occupied about two thirds of the territory; with Byzantine help Prince Radoslav pushed the Serbian forces across the mountains and won a decisive victory against the combined Serbian-Hungarian army at the Battle of Tara river in 1150. He lost to Serbian Prince Desa large parts of his territory at the very beginning of his reign in 1148, and his entire realm upon his death in 1162

  16. #41
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    570
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Default

    Late, Rascian

    The Byzantines gave numerous lands of the Grand Principality of Rascia to Stracimir, son of Prince Zavida of Zahumlje, who ruled in the name of his oldest brother, Grand Prince Tihomir of Rascia as a vassal of the Byzantine Empire since 1166. The majority of Duklja was included in his lands.
    Out of Diocleia Ribnica arose, which was the birthplace of Prince Stracimir's brother, Prince Nemanya, another of the sons of Prince Zavida of Zahumlje. Up to 1168 Nemanja ascended to the throne as Grand Prince of Rascia after he defeated Tihomir. Stracimire initially supported Tihomir in the fight, but drew back as soon as Tihomir started to lose.
    Stracimir's other brother, Prince Miroslav of Zahumlje had to call off his military expeditions against Korčula and Vis, because of the losing war against the Republic of Dubrovnik in 1184 in which Stracimir offered military assistance. Miroslav eventually drew from the war, while Stracimir didn't want to advance alone, so abandoned the conquest of the Republic too. Stracimir got the job to take the islands Korčula and Vis in 1185. The smaller part of his force managed to raid heavily Vis. Stracimir's galleys landed his forces on Korčula and took the island, but did not manage to control it, so they raided the island's fertile regions on the western part. The inhabitants of Korčula hailed the Dubrovnik Republic for assistance and it managed to capture all of Stracimir's galleys. Prince Stracimir managed to sign an agreement with the island's inhabitants: he guaranteed that the island will have autonomy, separated from Zahumlje; while the islanders agreed to help his forces set sail back to the mainland.
    Although Prince Stracimir was the factual ruler of Duklja, Prince Mihailo of the old ruling Voislav family and Stefan Nemanja's nephew remained as the titulary ruler. After Stracimir's passing away, Mihailo had claims to rule Duklja in the name of the Byzantine Emperor, rather than the Serbian Duke. In 1186, while Stefan Nemanja was at war with the Byzantine Empire, he went on a military campaign to incorporate Duklja into his realm. He besieged Bar which was under the leadership of the local Archbishop, Grgur. Grgur wrote the Chronicle of the Priest of Duklja in 1172-1196 to boost the morale of the people, attempting first to keep Duklja independent, and then only to mark its former glory. He predicted the return of the old regal power in Duklja, but his hopes were all in vain. Stefan Nemanja demanded 800 perpers of ransom to abandon the siege of Bar, while Prince Mihailo of Duklja was under attack by Nemanja's brothers. Stefan Nemanja gave Duklja in 1186 to his oldest son, Vukan, who asserted to power with the old regal title of King of Duklja and Dalmatia. In 1189, Prince Mihailo died and his Princess Desislava escaped with the remaining loyal nobility of Duklja and the Archbishop of Bar in her two ships to the Republic of Dubrovnik. Desislava then moved to Omis, where she died. Archbishop Grgur was exiled and his post temporarily abolished after Nemanja's capture of Bar, so he continued his chronicles in exile.
    Vukan of Nemanya maintained good relations with the Papacy, as he married the Pope's relative and accused Bosnia's Ban Kulin of heresy to the Pope. Vukan was enraged that he didn't inherit from Stefan Nemanja the Grand Princely throne which was contrary to the traditional system of primogeniture, so he rebelled against the new Grand Prince Stephen II the First-crowned of Nemanya with the help of the Dukljan nobility and managed to assess to the Grand Princely throne in 1202, but was deposed in 1204 by Stephen II with Bulgarian assistance. Vukan withdrew to Duklja where he continued to rule and kept fighting the Grand Prince.
    Around this time, the name Zeta replaced the ancient name of the region (name deriving from the river of Zeta). Its population is henceforward defined as Serbian.

  17. #42
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    neđe
    Posts
    225
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Default

    the Vojislavjevic dynasty was not serbian, they were Catholic Slavs
    "Kad slučajno zaželiš radit, śedi, pričekaj, viđećeš, proćiće te."

  18. #43
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    570
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CGmafiozz View Post
    the Vojislavjevic dynasty was not serbian, they were Catholic Slavs
    That does not necessary mean anything in this case.

    Numerous prominent members of the Vojislavljevic dynasty were Orthodox; Desa, many members of the Vukanovic, that is Urosevic branch; mainly those that were put to power in Bosnia and Rascia.

  19. #44
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    1,753
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Default

    Дукља ввас Сербиа! Год хелпс Сербс му бротхерс!

  20. #45
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Seoul, Korea
    Posts
    9,589
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    7
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    44
    Thanked in
    23 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Slavic
    Numerous prominent members of the Vojislavljevic dynasty were Orthodox; Desa, many members of the Vukanovic, that is Urosevic branch; mainly those that were put to power in Bosnia and Rascia.
    Be that as it may, they were still not Serbian. And moreover, the mainline Vojislavljevic dynasty was Catholic.

    Quote Originally Posted by OutLook View Post
    Дукља ввас Сербиа! Год хелпс Сербс му бротхерс!
    lol. :mrgreen:
    Last edited by MadGod; 09-06-07 at 14:21.

  21. #46
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    570
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MadGod View Post
    Be that as it may, they were still not Serbian. And moreover, the mainline Vojislavljevic dynasty was Catholic.



    lol. :mrgreen:

    No. All of their latter descendants were Orthodox.

    I think we've mistaken what "Serbian" means. What does it mean to you?

  22. #47
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Seoul, Korea
    Posts
    9,589
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    7
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    44
    Thanked in
    23 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Slavic View Post
    No. All of their latter descendants were Orthodox.
    That came naturally with the introduction of Orthodox path of christianity in the region. But at the peak of their power and influence, they were Catholic Slavs, and historically that carries more significance on the subject of Vojislavljevici.

    Quote Originally Posted by Slavic View Post
    I think we've mistaken what "Serbian" means. What does it mean to you?
    That would require a long answer that I'm really not interested in writing now. However, I think it's fairly obvious that the term "serbia" appeared much later in the course of history.

  23. #48
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    1,753
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Default

    Word "serbs", in the time of Vojislavljevic, stands for inferior peaple, aggrived peasants under Nemanjic's dinasty. Linguistical root is Servi (Servus lat., Servant eng.) - Sebri (old slav.) - Srblje/Srbalji/Srbi (srb.). There ware not an official nation till 18ct. It is quite rude for torrturing montenegrin history in that way, Slavic, 'couse its fact that is Montnenegro's historicly property docleans and zetas culture.
    Last edited by OutLook; 09-06-07 at 19:27.

  24. #49
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    570
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MadGod View Post
    That came naturally with the introduction of Orthodox path of christianity in the region. But at the peak of their power and influence, they were Catholic Slavs, and historically that carries more significance on the subject of Vojislavljevici.



    That would require a long answer that I'm really not interested in writing now. However, I think it's fairly obvious that the term "serbia" appeared much later in the course of history.
    In that time (at the time of Vojislavljevic's reign, don't mix with other) "Serbia" was a geo-historical name comprising Rascia, Bosnia, Doclea, Travunia with the Canalites and Zachlumia.

    Serbia is before mentioned, in the first half of the 10th century under Prince Ceslav Klonimirovic's (last of the dynasty of Vlastimirovic) reign, but it also included Pagania.

    As the Vojislavljevics rebuilt (under Constantine Bodin, aiming at there under Michael) a realm that matched exactly the same borders of Serbia before that, I guess that's why it was called "Serbia". Makes sense after all.

  25. #50
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    570
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OutLook View Post
    Word "serbs", in the time of Vojislavljevic, stands for inferior peaple, aggrived peasants under Nemanjic's dinasty. Linguistical root is Servi (Servus lat., Servant eng.) - Sebri (old slav.) - Srblje/Srbalji/Srbi (srb.). There ware not an official nation till 18ct. It is quite rude for torrturing montenegrin history in that way, Slavic, 'couse its fact that is Montnenegro's historicly property docleans and zetas culture.
    However, that has nothing to do with this.

    By the way the linguistical root has nothing to do with "Servi", since the term as such appeared before the Latin's approach (it was most probably brought from the slavic ancestryland). According to historiographical research, "Serbs" was a common name for all Slavs - it just happens that only two of the 16 Slavic peoples actually kept that name (Serbs and Sorbs).

    Oh and Nemanjics in the time of Vojislavljevics? But the Nemanjics are their successors, they didn't exist in the same time period.

    There was no official nation of any kind until the 18th century. The Montenegrins, for instance, became a nation in 1945. The French in the end of the 18th century... nations are a recent political invention.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. ŽIVOT DUKLJANSKE KRALJEVINE
    By G R A D in forum Istorija
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 26-07-11, 11:42
  2. "Vi govorite Crnogorski?" (1912. godina)
    By Petar Mrvaljevic in forum Istorija
    Replies: 111
    Last Post: 11-05-05, 15:15
  3. Montenegro Backs Off Separation--> SCG ce nadzivjeti sve
    By crnogorac in forum Budućnost Crne Gore
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 21-05-04, 19:07

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •